Nord Stream 2, the geopolitics of gas pipelines

The Biden-Putin summit in Geneva was an epochal event, capable of marking the turning point with the Trump era and re-establishing relations between the U.S. and Russia. There have been talking of many issues, from cybersecurity to nuclear. “A positive encounter,” according to Joe Biden. Vladimir Putin called it “productive.” During the summit, at least to see the official press releases. However, there was no mention of what happened a few days ago: Biden decided to spare Nord Stream AG from sanctions, the leading company involved in the construction of Nord Stream 2, a company with headquarters in Switzerland but owned by the Russian company Gazprom, which builds the second arm of the pipeline that crosses the Baltic. Just under 60 kilometers to complete the doubling of the Nord Stream, which from the Russian terminal of Vyborg, on the border with Finland, goes to the German one of Greifswald, in the country’s north-east. The doubling of the trans-Baltic gas pipeline will bring about 55 billion cubic meters of natural gas from Russia to Germany, bypassing the Visegrad countries (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Hungary – V4).

That gas supplies Germany and Eastern Europe directly, continuing down, potentially as far as Italy. That is yet another energy dominance project. Together with the Turk Stream, operational since the beginning of the year, the Nord Stream 2 will flood the Old Continent with Russian gas, in line with the current objectives of the “energy transition.”

Related Posts

According to the American news site Axios, Biden’s brake is precisely due to the desire not to clash with Berlin over its energy policy, trying to safeguard the space for mediation. Germany has strategically linked itself to Russia, unlike France, which has never given up on atomic energy. For Berlin, natural gas is now indispensable. The decision to decommission all coal-fired plants by 2038 has focused entirely on a mix of renewables and gas. But Nord Stream 2 said the new head of U.S. foreign policy Antony Blinken represents “a bad agreement for Germany, Ukraine, and all our partners in Central and Eastern Europe.” Therefore, it would be a Russian geopolitical project destined to split Europe and weaken the energy security of the Old Continent.

The two heads of state also discussed the situation in Ukraine. In a note, the association committee of E.U. and Ukrainian parliamentarians, at the end of an informal discussion, said: “We are deeply concerned about the resumption of construction work on the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, we consider it a geopolitical project, not commercial, aimed at expanding the geostrategic influence of Russia on Europe ». The text continues by asking the E.U. leadership to review its cooperation with Russia, immediately stopping the pipeline’s construction. But now, it is only a question of diplomacy. The Russian Deputy Prime Minister, Aleksandr Novak, said that the pipeline’s structure would be completed by the end of 2021. That was also stated by Rainer Seele, CEO of the Austrian oil and gas company Omv, on the sidelines of the works of the International Economic Forum of St. Petersburg. On June 3, U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan met Jan Hecker, German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s foreign policy adviser in Washington, to discuss Nord Stream 2 and what it would imply for Germany. Ukraine. On June 12, during the works of the G7 in Cornwall in the United Kingdom, Merkel herself had an interview with Joe Biden, and the two also talked about Nord Stream and Ukraine. The German Chancellor believes that the two countries are “on the right track” and reiterated the importance of Ukraine in the transit of gas from Russia to Europe.

At the end of the project, Vladimir Putin’s Russia will have an increasing weight on the international stage. If Nord Stream 2 sees the light, in a few months, Moscow will have collected its third success after the start of Turk Stream and the start of supplies to China of the pipeline called Power of Siberia. The American president has preferred, for now, to take the path of forgiveness or somewhat of prudence. But the message is clear, especially for the G7 partners: U.S. diplomacy is back.

Geopolitical Monitor

The daily developments on front of geopolitical relations and agendas are guaranteed to be brought to you. Assuring to bring to you the most unique point of view regarding the global developments

Recent Posts

The Rise of Deepfake Technology and How to Spot It

Deepfake technology has swiftly developed from a small-time AI experiment to a mass-scale online menace that affects politics, media, cybersecurity,… Read More

January 3, 2026

Trump Breaks Silence on Venezuela Operation in First Post-Action Interview

Former U.S. President has granted his first interview with The New York Times in the light of a recent U.S.… Read More

January 3, 2026

Iran Protests Enter Sixth Day as Economic Crisis and Political Repression Spark Nationwide Unrest

It is the sixth day of the Iranian protests that have demonstrated a growing crisis in the country as a… Read More

January 3, 2026

10 Must-See TV shows to Watch in 2026: What to Watch Next Year

The 2026 television lineup is already becoming one of the most anticipated lineups in recent history, with long-awaited returns, radical… Read More

January 3, 2026

Renewed Tensions Reported in Southern Yemen Near Saudi Border

The situation in Yemen deteriorated overnight as combat erupted on the border between the country and Saudi Arabia between Saudi-supported… Read More

January 3, 2026

Most Anticipated Movies of 2026: Hollywood’s Biggest Blockbusters and Cinematic Events

It is expected that 2026 is going to be one of the most ambitious and high-stakes years in the history… Read More

January 2, 2026

This website uses cookies.

Read More