China’s Ruling Party Holds Plenary Sessions to Further Firm Xi’s Grip on the Leadership

China – Chinese President Xi Jinping, a leader of the world’s second-largest economy, heads an urgent plenary session of the party’s top figures one week from now to establish his ground for a long-term rule.

This year, the meeting makes them ready for the twentieth party congress next pre-winter – at which Xi is broadly expected to be run a third term in office, establishing his situation as China’s most remarkable leader since Mao Zedong. 

According to state news agency Xinhua, top leaders will discuss an essential resolution celebrating the party’s main achievements in its 100 years of existence at the following week’s plenary.

Related Posts

• China irked on the opening of the Taiwan office in Lithuania
• China: the journalist who reveals the Covid-19 emergency risks dying in jail
• Cop26: all the world leaders’ promises in Glasgow
• EC Warns Against Use Of Article 16 Of The Protocol
• Let’s go, Brandon: the Stadium insult to Biden ends up on Trump’s shirts
• Sudan’s army orders release of 4 ministers
• Taiwan welcomes EU’s delegation amid rising tensions with China
• Why Is American Senate Stalling Key Diplomatic Appointments?

Critics say the resolution, just the third of its sort in the party’s set of experiences, will assist Xi with supporting his grasp on power by determining his vision for China ahead of the crucial 2022 party congress.

Approximately 400 people from the Communist Party’s powerful Central Committee assembled in Beijing in closed doors from Monday to Thursday. 

The content has not yet been published in its entirety; however, the timing of the decision is significant, as was the case with the former two resolutions.

The first resolution was passed under Mao’s rule in 1945, which assisted him to solidify his position over the Communist Party four years before it held onto power. 

The second resolution was embraced under Deng Xiaoping’s rule in 1981, which witnessed the system take on economic changes and perceive the “botches” of Ma”o’s methodologies.