Australian MP Seeks De Facto Suppression Order

 The Australian MP Charles Christian Porter has been accused of seeking a de-facto suppression order that will protect his reputation; in a case where he has barred media companies from reporting on confidential parts of the ABC’s defamation defence.

The West Australian MP is seeking a declaration that the outlets will not use any documents for a single purpose of intervention in the case, under a legal rule known as the Hearne Versus Street obligation.

Mr. Porter had earlier in the year Australia Broadcasting Corporation over one of their journalists Louise Milligan alleging an unnamed senior minister having been subjected to historical rape.

Later, it was discovered that the senior minister was Mr. Porter itself and he denied the allegations. No charges were levied or arrests made. Porter has since then joined the Ministry of Industry. After a defamation case was settled in beginning of August, concerned parties had asked for un-redacted defence documents. These include media agencies like News Corp and Nine.

The concerned companies seem to be interested in using the same, despite the fact a court ruling prevented mention of a formal statement made by Porter in earlier hearings. It was becoming evident that they did not want to adhere and respect the Hearne V Street obligation that guarantees a party in a lawsuit to keep documents to itself, but not to allow people to protect themselves from other parties’ documents.

Related Posts

But Nine, subsidiary of ABC, Fairfax, and News Corp all say that such relief isn’t possible as the former federal attorney general does not own the 37-page document. Further, according to the lawyer representing Nine, said that she had reasons to reject Porter’s application on eight counts including that it was filed three days after the matter was officially discontinued on 9 August.

Mr. Porter might just run the risk of mud slinging after all. His latest application targets the unredacted defence and reply provided to the three media outlets before the July 2021 ruling. All this does bring into question the death of the accuser due to suicide and its ongoing investigations.

Order of suppression still stands.

Admin

Recent Posts

“Buzz World Tour” of Nikki in Manila is trending!!!

The coming year 2025, Indonesian singer and songwriter Nikki is on a World Tour for her two-night concerts in Manila… Read More

November 26, 2024

Gary Barlow to Perform at High Lodge as Part of Forestry England’s Forest Live Series

Gary Barlow famous for his role in Take That and as a solo artist, will headline a concert at High… Read More

November 26, 2024

Is X Making It Harder to Share News? Paul Graham Weighs In

Musk criticised the users of X who share the links of other websites instead giving a brief description on their… Read More

November 26, 2024

Breaking: Ravens Edge Chargers in Monday Night Showdown, 30-23

The Baltimore Ravens showcased their dominance by defeating the Los Angeles Chargers by 30-23 on the road to wrap up… Read More

November 26, 2024

Elon Musk teases the idea of acquiring the American news channel “MSNBC”

Musk’s new business venture provoked the trollers and other online celebrities to make fun of one of his ardent supporters… Read More

November 25, 2024

Family moments of Prince Andrew with his daughters Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice amidst the arduous milieu

Prince Andrew, the Duke of York hails from the Royal Family of his parents Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip,… Read More

November 25, 2024

This website uses cookies.

Read More