Remarks on Prophet Muhammad create diplomatic rift between India and Gulf nations

The Indian government is finding itself entangled in a diplomatic rift with Gulf countries after two spokespeople of the country’s ruling party, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), made Islamophobic and derogatory comments against and insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

The ruling BJP party has responded by suspending its national spokesperson, Nupur Sharma, and expelled its Delhi media head, Naveen Kumar Jindal, after their alleged comments against the Prophet met with anger and criticism in the Middle Eastern countries.

What were the comments against Prophet?

About 10 days ago in a televised debate on Indian news channel Times Now, Nupur Sharma had made derogatory comments about Islam and Prophet, mocking her Muslim debate opponent. Later, Jindal too had posted comment on Twitter in same line, which he further deleted.

The comments from ruling party’s members were met with strong criticism by governments of Qatar, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Oman and Pakistan, calling them as “insulting”.

Deepak Mittal, the Indian ambassador to Qatar was summoned, who was given official reprimand “expressing the disappointment of the State of Qatar and its total rejection and condemnation to the controversial remarks made by an official in the ruling party in India against Prophet Muhammad”.  

Demand of apology from Indian Government

Qatar called for an apology from Indian government led by PM Narendra Modi, accusing it of triggering “a cycle of violence and hate”. Lolwah al-Khater, Qatar’s assistant foreign minister, said “India was reaching dangerous levels of Islamophobic discourse”.

Call for boycott of Indian goods in the Gulf states

Gulf states quickly took on to the course of boycotting Indian goods in the retail market. This pushed India to take a quick action citing important trade relations between India and GCC states. Both the spokespersons were removed by BJP that stated “strong action has already been taken against those who made the derogatory remarks”.

Indian government also dismissed the comments by both ousted party members as “fringe elements” within the party and stressed that they “do not, in any manner, reflect the views of the government of India”.

N. Mathur

Recent Posts

NATO Strengthens Eastern Flank Amid Rising Security Threats

NATO is also working faster to build up its eastern flank against the increasing security threats in border areas in… Read More

January 5, 2026

2026’s Most Anticipated Movies Set to Redefine the Global Box Office

Film enthusiasts are jumping into a blockbuster year with movie companies stacking franchise follow-ups, fresh movie worlds, and daring originals… Read More

January 5, 2026

Air Power as Punishment: How Saudi Strikes in Southern Yemen Are Tearing Communities Apart

Recent Saudi airstrikes in the southern part of Yemen cannot be shoved off as typical battlefield accidents and transient confrontations.… Read More

January 5, 2026

Travel Trends 2026: Where to Go and Avoid

Travel trends 2026 point to a more selective, value-driven traveler who plans earlier, stays longer, and avoids overcrowded hotspots. The… Read More

January 5, 2026

Trump Plans US Oil Firms to Invest Billions in Venezuela

Former US President Donald Trump is reportedly considering a plan that would allow US oil companies to invest billions in… Read More

January 5, 2026

The Rise of Deepfake Technology and How to Spot It

Deepfake technology has swiftly developed from a small-time AI experiment to a mass-scale online menace that affects politics, media, cybersecurity,… Read More

January 3, 2026

This website uses cookies.

Read More